https://teejeep.com/product/I Dont Crash I Do Random Gravity Checks Motocross Dirt Bike shirt
The profile of the I Dont Crash I Do Random Gravity Checks Motocross Dirt Bike shirt (Muhammed Mythers are an even rarer and stranger breed) is alarmingly consistent. They are almost invariably amateur, self published and with a notable antireligious axe to grind. I could suggest a drinking game where you go through Wikipedia’s list of Christ Myth proponents taking a shot of Tequila each time one of them is explicitly identified as being part of an atheist group, but you’d likely be dead before you reached F. The name that gets thrown around more than any other is Richard Carrier, who is very much the ‘usual suspect’ in these debates. Carrier fits two of our above criteria, being largely self published and having a notable axe to grind (he was known as an antireligious blogger before he was known as a Christ mythicist), but is a qualified – if not exactly professional – historian. He is, in fact, Doctor Richard Carrier having obtained a PhD in the very relevant field of ancient history from Columbia University in 2008.
I Dont Crash I Do Random Gravity Checks Motocross Dirt Bike shirt, Hoodie, Sweater, Ladie Tee, Vneck, Bellaflowy, Kids Shirt, Unisex and Tank Top, T-shirt
Best I Dont Crash I Do Random Gravity Checks Motocross Dirt Bike shirt
Sadly, Carrier’s PhD is just about the only credible thing about I Dont Crash I Do Random Gravity Checks Motocross Dirt Bike shirt. He can’t reasonably be called a professional historian as he’s never been paid as one. He has never obtained any kind of academic position. His conduct in regards to his field isn’t exactly inspiring, either. Carrier claims his work is peer reviewed despite the fact the university that allegedly peer reviews it has stated unequivocally that this isn’t true and that he isn’t associated with them in any way. His communication with other professionals largely consists of him calling them -some of them word leaders in their field – insane and questioning their academic competence. His work is tied up in absurd nonsense involving using Bayes Theorem to ‘prove’ historical theories (the same theorem William Lane Craig used to show Jesus rose from the dead, which really should be setting off alarm bells). He is, in the academic world, an entirely disgraced laughing stock.